Skip to content

LCA Links!

Links to LCA topics found on the web


Tag: greenwash

Press Release: October 6, 2010

Seeks Public Comment on Changes that Would Update Guides and Make Them Easier to Use

The Federal Trade Commission today proposed revisions to the guidance that it gives marketers to help them avoid making misleading environmental claims. The proposed changes are designed to update the Guides and make them easier for companies to understand and use. The changes to the Green Guides include new guidance on marketers use of product certifications and seals of approval, renewable energy claims, renewable materials claims, and carbon offset claims. The FTC is seeking public comments on the proposed changes until December 10, 2010, after which it will decide which changes to make final.

In recent years, businesses have increasingly used green marketing to capture consumers attention and move Americans toward a more environmentally friendly future. But what companies think green claims mean and what consumers really understand are sometimes two different things, said FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz. The proposed updates to the Green Guides will help businesses better align their product claims with consumer expectations.

The Green Guides were first issued in 1992 to help marketers ensure that the claims they are making are true and substantiated. The Guides were revised in 1996 and 1998. The guidance they provide includes: 1) general principles that apply to all environmental marketing claims; 2) how consumers are likely to interpret particular claims and how marketers can substantiate these claims; and 3) how marketers can qualify their claims to avoid deceiving consumers.

The proposed Guides issued today include changes designed to strengthen the FTC's guidance on those marketing claims that are already addressed in the current Guides as well as to provide new guidance on marketing claims that were not common when the Guides were last reviewed. The proposed changes were developed using information collected from three public workshops, public comments, and a study of how consumers understand certain environmental claims.

Proposed Revisions to the Guides

The revised Guides caution marketers not to make blanket, general claims that a product is environmentally friendly or eco-friendly because the FTC's consumer perception study confirms that such claims are likely to suggest that the product has specific and far-reaching environmental benefits. Very few products, if any, have all the attributes consumers seem to perceive from such claims, making these claims nearly impossible to substantiate.

The proposed Guides also caution marketers not to use unqualified certifications or seals of approval for those that do not specify the basis for the certification. The Guides more prominently state that unqualified product certifications and seals of approval likely constitute general environmental benefit claims, and they advise marketers that the qualifications they apply to certifications or seals should be clear, prominent, and specific.

Next, the proposed revised Guides advise marketers how consumers are likely to understand certain environmental claims, including that a product is degradable, compostable, or free of a particular substance. For example, if a marketer claims that a product that is thrown in the trash is biodegradable, it should decompose in a reasonably short period of time of no more than one year.

New Guidance Proposed

The proposed changes would update the Guides by giving advice about claims that are not addressed in the current Guides, such as claims about the use of renewable materials and renewable energy. The FTC's consumer perception research suggests that consumers could be misled by these claims because they interpret them differently than marketers intend. Because of this, the Guides advise marketers to provide specific information about the materials and energy used. Moreover, marketers should not make unqualified renewable energy claims if the power used to manufacture any part of the product was derived from fossil fuels.

The proposed revised Guides also provide new advice about carbon offset claims. Carbon offsets fund projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions in one place in order to counterbalance or offset emissions that occur elsewhere. The Guides advise marketers to disclose if the emission reductions that are being offset by a consumer's purchase will not occur within two years. They also advise marketers to avoid advertising an offset if the activity that produces the offset is already required by law.

The FTC is seeking comment on all aspects of its proposal. Examples include:

  • How should marketers qualify products made with renewable materials claims, if at all, to avoid deception?
  • Should the FTC provide guidance concerning how long consumers think it will take a liquid substance to completely degrade?
  • How do consumers understand “carbon offset and carbon neutral claims? Is there any evidence of consumer confusion concerning the use of these claims?

A complete set of questions can be found in Section VII of the Guides Request for Comment.

In addition, the proposed Guides have been reorganized and simplified where possible so they are easier for businesses to read and use.

Finally, either because the FTC lacks a sufficient basis to provide meaningful guidance or because the FTC wants to avoid proposing guidance that duplicates rules or guidance of other agencies, the proposed Guides do not address use of the terms sustainable, natural, and organic. Organic claims made for textiles and other products derived from agricultural products are currently covered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Organic Program.

The Commission vote approving the issuance of the proposed revised Green Guides for public comment was 5-0. They can be found on the FTC's website and as a link to this press release at A summary of the proposed revised Guides can be found at The FTC is accepting comments on the Guides for 60 days, beginning today and continuing until December 10, 2010. Interested parties can submit comments in paper form by following the instructions in the Request for Comment section of the Federal Register notice. Comments can be submitted electronically at:

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC's online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,800 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC's website provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.

Mitchell J. Katz
Office of Public Affairs

Defra has announced a proposed update of their Green Claims Guidance.  The update will make it easier for businesses to market their ‘green’ credentials in a fair and understandable way.

Environment Minister Dan Norris said:  “With so many products claiming to be environmentally friendly, it is difficult to tell which companies are really making big improvements. The updated Green Claims Guidance will help businesses with genuine ‘green’ credentials by providing clear practical guidance on how they should advertise. Importantly, it will protect consumers from misleading and confusing claims.

“The proposed new enforcement powers should build consumers’ confidence that legally binding minimum energy efficiency standards for products are being met and that energy labels are accurate, so they can make properly informed choices. This will make it easier for people to do the right thing by the environment.”

Referencing ISO 14021, the Green Claims Guidance represents good practice to be followed on a voluntary basis, and can be applied to any marketing and advertising that companies wish to make about their environmental performance. The guidance sets out the key principles that businesses should consider to ensure their claims are clear, accurate and relevant to consumers.  The update to the guidance strengthens the principles from the previous guidance and provides more practical information and advice relevant to the current market.

The consultation can be found on the Defra website here:

Seventy-eight companies nationwide have received Federal Trade Commission letters warning that they may be breaking the law by selling clothing and other textile products that are labeled and advertised as “bamboo,” but actually are made of manufactured rayon fiber. The letters, which the agency’s staff sent last week, make the retailers aware of the FTC’s concerns about possible mislabeling of rayon products as “bamboo,” so the companies can take corrective steps to avoid Commission action.

The full press release can be found HERE

The companies that received the warning letter from the FTC can be found HERE

Consumer NZ, a consumer watchdog e-zine based in New Zealand reports that several companies advertize misleading claims of green performance of the textile products made from bamboo.   The February edition of its magazine reported that most clothing sold in shops labeled as being made of bamboo was actually made out of rayon, or viscose. Rayon, or viscose, is a fiber made from plants and trees, including bamboo, through a chemical process that includes sodium hydroxide and carbon disulfide, both substances can result in high sulfur emissions.    

Consumer NZ states “Companies that label clothing as ‘made from bamboo’ are misleading consumers.  Most bamboo textiles are rayon and should be labeled as such.”    

Last year, the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released a statement saying, “Bamboo-based textiles, actually made of rayon, are not antimicrobial, made in an environmentally friendly manner, or biodegradable.”  The FTC charged four US companies with deceptively labeling and advertising textile items as made of bamboo, when they were made of rayon. It also noted “rayon does not retain any natural antimicrobial properties of the bamboo plant”. 

The FTC recommends “if you sell clothing, linens, or other textile products, you’re responsible for making truthful disclosures about the fiber content. If your product isn’t made directly of bamboo fiber — but is a manufactured fiber for which bamboo was the plant source — it should be labeled and advertised using the proper generic name for the fiber, such as rayon, or “rayon made from bamboo.”  Any claims a company makes about their textile products have to be true and cannot be misleading. As the seller, it must have substantiation for each and every claim — express and implied — that are made. 

The New Zealand Commerce Commission spokeswoman Felicity Connell was quoted saying that there was no specific legislation governing bamboo.  “The New Zealand regulations are not as specific as fiber derived from bamboo cellulose must be labeled as ‘rayon’.” 

The original article from Consumer NZ can be found here: